August 17, 2010

Traffic Stop Results in Burglary Arrests

Last month, twenty year-old Jacob Hurst of Tazewell, TN and his nineteen year-old female companion were arrested as suspects in connection with multiple burglaries that had recently taken place in Claiborne County after a routine traffic stop and ensuing vehicle search uncovered a significant amount of cash and other valuables that were believed to have been taken during the robberies. Apparently, a full-scale investigation was launched into the robberies after the evidence was uncovered during the stop and the authorities now believe that Mr. Hurst and his companion were responsible for the slew of robberies. The robberies are now considered “solved” according to reports.

Continue reading "Traffic Stop Results in Burglary Arrests" »

Bookmark: Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Google.com Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at del.icio.us Digg Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Digg.com Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Spurl.net Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Simpy.com Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at NewsVine Blink this Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at blinklist.com Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Furl.net Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at reddit.com Fark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Fark.com Bookmark Traffic%20Stop%20Results%20in%20Burglary%20Arrests at Yahoo! MyWeb

March 15, 2010

Scope of Automobile Searches: Containers

In previous articles, this blog has discussed the vehicle exception to the requirement that law enforcement officials must obtain a search warrant in order to search a person’s property for evidence of a crime. Simply put, law enforcement officials may search a vehicle without a warrant where they have probable cause to believe that evidence of criminal activity will be found inside the vehicle and where exigent circumstances exist that necessitate searching the vehicle immediately. With respect to automobiles, the requisite circumstances basically exist where the automobile can be driven out of the jurisdiction and thus poses the threat of loss or destruction of evidence. Although this exception has been in place for quite a while, it has not always been clear exactly how intrusive the search was allowed to be with respect to items found inside the vehicle. That is, can law enforcement officials only seize what is in “plain view” in the vehicle, or may they conduct a more extensive search that extends to opening containers, bags, etc. that are found inside the vehicle?

In California v. Acevedo, the United States Supreme Court provided some clarity on this issue. In summary, the Court held that where police officers have probable cause to search a vehicle under the vehicle exception the officers are allowed to search containers such as bags, cans, pouches, and so forth to the same extent that they would be allowed to search them had they actually gone before a magistrate and obtained a search warrant. This holding basically means that if the police have probable cause to search a part of a vehicle, they are also allowed to search inside containers found in that part of the vehicle that may contain evidence of criminal activity. It should be noted, however, that this ruling does not extend outside the subject of containers found inside vehicles. That is, the ruling does not take away the requirement that law enforcement officials have probable cause in order to search all or part of a vehicle. This requirement will be explained in more detail in upcoming blogs.